<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating CEOs from the perspective of a VC</title>
	<link>http://www.biggersmall.com/2008/01/24/evaluating-ceos-from-the-perspective-of-a-vc/</link>
	<description>Fertilizer for Small Business Growth</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mcooch</title>
		<link>http://www.biggersmall.com/2008/01/24/evaluating-ceos-from-the-perspective-of-a-vc/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>mcooch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.biggersmall.com/2008/01/24/evaluating-ceos-from-the-perspective-of-a-vc/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Seth - that's great advice.  I think many entrepreneurs/CEOs operate in a vacuum if they don't have outside funding, but it shouldn't be that way if they hope to develop themselves and their business at a competitive pace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Seth - that&#8217;s great advice.  I think many entrepreneurs/CEOs operate in a vacuum if they don&#8217;t have outside funding, but it shouldn&#8217;t be that way if they hope to develop themselves and their business at a competitive pace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth</title>
		<link>http://www.biggersmall.com/2008/01/24/evaluating-ceos-from-the-perspective-of-a-vc/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.biggersmall.com/2008/01/24/evaluating-ceos-from-the-perspective-of-a-vc/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>mike - your point about self evaluation is right on.  i'd extend that to include regular 'check-ins' with people around you that you trust.  the point is not after the fact evaluation of performance, but a model and context for a conversation about ongoing improvement.

we actually did a similar review of the foundry partners.  in our case we had our portfolio ceo's, other board members, our co-investors and our staff (not to mention each other) evaluate us.  the results were really interesting and extremely helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mike - your point about self evaluation is right on.  i&#8217;d extend that to include regular &#8216;check-ins&#8217; with people around you that you trust.  the point is not after the fact evaluation of performance, but a model and context for a conversation about ongoing improvement.</p>
<p>we actually did a similar review of the foundry partners.  in our case we had our portfolio ceo&#8217;s, other board members, our co-investors and our staff (not to mention each other) evaluate us.  the results were really interesting and extremely helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
